Canterbury JC 17 September 2022 – R2 – Corey Campbell

ID: RIB11120

Respondent(s):
Corey Campbell - Jockey

Applicant:
John Oatham - Chief Stipendiary Steward

Adjudicators:
Stewart Ching (Chair), Olivia Jarvis

Persons Present:
Veronica Algar - Stipendiary Steward

Information Number:
A21473

Decision Type:
Race Related Charge

Charge:
Breach of Whip Rule

Rule(s):
638(3)(f)(ii) - Contravention whip rule - Whip action above shoulder height

Plea:
Admitted

Animal Name:
VERMONT

Code:
Thoroughbred

Race Date:
17/09/2022

Race Club:
Canterbury Jockey Club

Race Location:
Riccarton Park - 165 Racecourse Road, Christchurch,

Race Number:
R2

Hearing Date:
17/09/2022

Hearing Location:
Riccarton Park

Outcome: Proved

Penalty: Jockey Corey Campbell is fined $250

EVIDENCE:

Following the running of Race 2, the Respondent, Class A Rider Corey Campbell admitted a charge alleging that he used his whip with his arm raised above shoulder height when riding VERMONT over the concluding stages.

Rule 638(3)(f) provides that a Rider must not use his or her whip:

(ii)  using an action that raises the Rider’s arm above shoulder height.

Using the available video replays, Stipendiary Steward, Veronica Algar, demonstrated that the Respondent struck his mount on 3 occasions approaching the 100-metre mark, using an action with the whip that raised his arm above shoulder height.

Mr Campbell agreed with the Stewards’ assessment of the incident.

DECISION:

As the Respondent, Mr Campbell has admitted the breach, the Adjudicative Committee finds the breach proved.

SUBMISSIONS FOR PENALTY:

Mr Oatham produced the Respondent, Mr Campbell’s record, which indicated no previous breaches of this particular Whip Rule within the last 6 months.

Mr Oatham stated that there was no starting point for an initial breach of this particular Rule in the Penalty Guidelines, but submitted that recent historic penalties showed a starting point of $250 was being adopted.

Mr Campbell made no submissions in regard to penalty.

REASONS FOR PENALTY:

This Adjudicative Committee, after taking into consideration the fact that this was Mr Campbell’s 1st breach, and after researching historic penalties under this particular Rule, determined that a fine of $250 was an appropriate penalty in this case.

CONCLUSION:

The Respondent is fined the sum of $250.

Decision Date: 17/09/2022

Publish Date: 19/09/2022