Auckland TR 11 March 2023 – R9 – Lynsey Satherley
ID: RIB17199
Animal Name:
ROGER THAT
Code:
Thoroughbred
Race Date:
11/03/2023
Race Club:
Auckland Thoroughbred Racing
Race Location:
Pukekohe Park - 222/250 Manukau Road, Pukekohe Hill, Pukekohe, 2120
Race Number:
R9
Hearing Date:
11/03/2023
Hearing Location:
Pukekohe Park Racecourse
Outcome: Proved
Penalty: Jockey Lynsey Satherley is fined $500
Evidence
Following the running of Race 9, the Respondent, Jockey, L Satherley admitted a charge alleging excessive whip use prior to the 100 metres.
Rule 638(3)(g)(i) provides that in a Flat Race a Rider must not:
(i) strike a horse with a whip more than 5 times prior to the 100-metre mark (other than in a slapping motion down the shoulder with the whip hand remaining on the reins); or
Using the available race films, Mr Oatham (Chief Stipendiary Steward) demonstrated that the Respondent struck her mount 7 times from the straight entrance to the 100-metre mark. He said 3 of the strikes were prior to entering the straight and 4 were in the straight
Mrs Satherley agreed with Mr Oatham’s submissions.
Decision
As the Respondent admitted the breach, the Adjudicative Committee finds the breach proved (Rule 915(1)(d) refers).
Submissions For Penalty
Mr Oatham produced the Respondent’s record which indicated one previous breach in the preceding 6 months.
Stewards submitted a penalty commensurate with the NZTR Revised Penalty Guide for excessive whip use (as of 1 March 2022).
The Respondent provided no submissions on penalty.
Reasons For Penalty
The Penalty Guide starting point for a breach of this nature is;
For any black type race, a 2nd breach, 2 strikes over, the greater of 50% of Jockey’s stake earnings or $500.
Mrs Satherley’s mount earned $7,500 (Jockey’s percentage $375).
After considering the film evidence, the submissions and having due regard for the number and frequency of strikes; the force used; the Adjudicative Committee determined there are no compelling reasons to depart from the starting point set out in the Penalty Guide.
On that basis the Respondent is fined $500.
Conclusion
L Satherley  is fined $500.
Decision Date: 11/03/2023
Publish Date: 14/03/2023