Riccarton Park – Canterbury JC 13 April 2024 – Ashvin Goindasamy

ID: RIB40984

Respondent(s):
Ashvin Chandrasen Goindasamy - Jockey

Applicant:
John Oatham - Chief Stipendiary Steward

Adjudicators:
Stewart Ching (Chair), Russell McKenzie

Persons Present:
Ashvin Goindasamy, John Oatham

Information Number:
A21193

Decision Type:
Race Related Charge

Charge:
Breach of whip Rule

Rule(s):
638(3)(g) (i) - Contravention whip rule

Plea:
Admitted

Animal Name:
SENSE OF TIMING

Code:
Thoroughbred

Race Date:
13/04/2024

Race Club:
Canterbury Jockey Club

Race Location:
Riccarton Park - 165 Racecourse Road, Christchurch,

Race Number:
R6

Hearing Date:
13/04/2024

Hearing Location:
Riccarton Park

Outcome: Proved

Penalty: Jockey Ashvin Goindasamy is fined $500

Evidence

Following the running of Race 6, the Respondent Ashvin Goindasamy, Class A  Rider, admitted a charge alleging excessive whip use prior to the 100 metres.

Rule 638(3)(g)(i) provides that in a Flat Race a Rider must not:

(i) strike a horse with a whip more than 5 times prior to the 100-metre mark (other than in a slapping motion down the shoulder with the whip hand remaining on the reins); 

Using the available race films, Chief Stipendiary Steward Mr Oatham demonstrated that the Respondent struck his mount 7 times from the straight entrance to the 100-metre mark. He pointed out a further 4 strikes from the 100m to the post.

In response, by way of explanation, the Respondent Mr Goindasamy, said his mount was travelling good and he miscounted the strikes used.

Decision

As the Respondent Mr Goindasamy admitted the breach, the Adjudicative Committee finds the breach proved (Rule 915(1)(d) refers).

Submissions for Penalty

Mr Oatham produced the Respondent’s record, which indicated 1 previous breach, being at Ashburton on 4 April 2024, where he received a warning.

Mr Oatham submitted that a fine of $500 for a second offence with 2 additional strikes, as per the Penalty Guide, be considered as penalty.

The Respondent made no submissions in regard to penalty.

Reasons for Penalty

The Penalty Guide starting point for a breach of this nature is set out below.

For breaches of the Whip Rule prior to the 100m mark:

2nd offence with 2 additional strikes $500 fine

After considering the film evidence and submissions, the Adjudicative Committee determined there were no aggravating factors to consider. The Adjudicative Committee determined there were no compelling reasons to depart from the starting point as set out in the Penalty Guide.

On that basis, the Respondent is fined $500.

Conclusion

The Respondent Mr Goindasamy is fined $500.

Decision Date: 13/04/2024

Publish Date: 15/04/2024