Waikato TR 7 February 2026 – R5 – Samantha Collett

Evidence

Following the running of Race 5, the Sir Patrick Hogan Karapiro Classic of $350,000, the Respondent Class A Rider Ms S Collett admitted a charge alleging use of whip in consecutive strides over the concluding stages. Particulars of the charge were that Ms Collett struck her mount THAT’S GOLD in two consecutive strides inside the 100 metres.

Rule 638(3)(g)(ii) provides that in a Flat Race a Rider must not:

(ii) strike a horse with a whip in consecutive strides at any stage of the race.

Using the available race films, Chief Stipendiary Steward Mr Oatham identified THAT’S GOLD, who was in front and on the fence inside the last 100 metres of the race. He said that 4 to 5 strides from the finish, Ms Collett struck her mount twice in consecutive strides.

Mr Oatham said that although Ms Collett won the race, it is difficult to say whether the extra strikes made any difference in terms of the final result.

In response, by way of explanation, Ms Collett stated that the charge is not disputed, but she said that she did not gain any advantage.

Decision

As Ms Collett admitted the breach, the Adjudicative Committee finds the charge proved.

Submissions for Penalty

Mr Oatham produced Ms Collett’s record, which indicated one previous warning. He said that this breach therefore constitutes her second breach of the Rule within the reset period. But for penalty setting purposes, this is her first charge under the Rule.

Mr Oatham submitted that the Penalty Guide provides for a $150 fine. He pointed out that the breach occurred in a Special Conditions race, with stakemoney of $350,000. The winner received $175,000 and, on that basis, he said there should be a significant uplift from the $150 fine starting point. He suggested a fine in the vicinity of $1,000 would be appropriate.

Ms Collett had nothing to add in terms of penalty.

Reasons for Penalty

The Penalty Guide specifies that the starting point fine for a breach of this type is a fine of $150.

Although Ms Collett won the race by a short margin, it cannot necessarily be said that she won because of the two consecutive strikes. However, the fact that her mount won the race, is relevant in terms of penalty. Under Rule 920(2), the Adjudicative Committee has the discretion to consider key factors such as the race’s status and the stakes payable, when determining the appropriate penalty. This ensures that the penalty reflects not only the nature of the breach, but also the financial implications of the race.

Ms Collett’s share of the stakes was about $8,750. Therefore, in light of the stakes and status, a significant penalty uplift is required.

After considering the film evidence, the submissions and having due regard for the number of consecutive strikes, the Adjudicative Committee determined a fine of $1,000 to be appropriate in the circumstances.

Conclusion

Class A Rider Ms Collett is fined $1,000.