Riccarton Park – Banks Peninsula RC 4 February 2026 – R11 – Darren Danis

ID: RIB63533

Respondent(s):
Darren Justin Luke Danis - Jockey

Applicant:
Rebecca Haley - Stipendiary Steward

Adjudicators:
Stewart Ching (Chair)

Persons Present:
Rebecca Haley - Stipendiary Steward, Darren Danis - Class A Rider, John Oatham - Chief Stipendiary Steward

Information Number:
A20478

Decision Type:
Race Related Charge

Charge:
Excessive use of the whip

Rule(s):
638(3)(g)(i) - Contravention whip rule

Plea:
Admitted

Animal Name:
LIFE OF RILEY

Code:
Thoroughbred

Race Date:
04/02/2026

Race Club:
Banks Peninsula Racing Club

Race Location:
Riccarton Park - 165 Racecourse Road, Christchurch,

Race Number:
R11

Hearing Date:
04/02/2026

Hearing Location:
Riccarton Park

Outcome: Proved

Penalty: Jockey Darren Danis is fined $250

Following the running of Race 11, the Respondent Class A Rider, Darren Danis, admitted a charge alleging excessive whip use prior to the 100 metres in “that when riding LIFE OF RILEY he struck his mount 7 times prior to the 100m with a further 4 inside the final 100 metres.”

The Respondent acknowledged he understood the Rule, the nature of the charge and confirmed his admission of the breach.

Rule 638(3)(g)(i) provides that in a Flat Race a Rider must not:

(i) strike a horse with a whip more than 5 times prior to the 100-metre mark (other than in a slapping motion down the shoulder with the whip hand remaining on the reins); or

Using the available race film, Stipendiary Steward Rebecca Haley, with the assistance of Chief Stipendiary Steward John Oatham, demonstrated that the Respondent struck his mount 7 times from near the 400m to the 100-metre mark. She added that Mr Danis used the whip on a further 4 occasions inside the 100m, excluding him from the exemption under the Rules.

Mr Danis elected to make no submissions in regard to the breach.

Decision

As the Respondent Mr Danis admitted the breach, the Adjudicative Committee finds the breach proved (Rule 915(1)(d) refers).

Submissions for Penalty

Ms Haley produced the Respondent’s record, which indicated a clear record.

She stated the Penalty Guide for an initial breach of excessive whip use for 2 additional strikes was a $250 fine and submitted that a fine commensurate with the Penalty Guide be considered as penalty.

Mr Danis elected to make no submissions in regard to penalty.

Reasons for Penalty

The Penalty Guide starting point for a breach of this nature is set out below.

For breaches of the Whip Rule prior to the 100m mark:

1st offence starting point $250 fine where there are 2 additional strikes

This Adjudicative Committee determined that there were no aggravating factors to consider, therefore no uplift in penalty was warranted.

It was therefore determined that an appropriate penalty in this case was a $250 fine.

Conclusion

The Respondent Mr Danis is fined the sum of $250.

Decision Date: 04/02/2026

Publish Date: 09/02/2026